Editors and AI, Part V: Will AI Replace Human Editors?

artificial intelligence

"Will AI replace editors?"

I see this question pop up regularly in professional forums, client conversations, and late-night worry sessions. It's whispered in conference hallways and debated in heated online discussions. I get it—there's something deeply unsettling about the possibility that work we've spent years perfecting could be automated away.

In previous posts in this series, I've explored the technical side of AI, which tools actually use it, how it makes mistakes, and why simply saying "no" to it isn't necessarily the answer.

Today, I want to go deeper. Why? Because I've realized that our conversations about AI and editing aren't just about features and limitations. They're about something far more profound—the very heart of what we do as editors. Let’s explore what’s really at stake, and why, even in a world of increasingly sophisticated AI, your human editorial expertise remains essential.

The Historical Context: New Technologies Always Trigger Fear

Throughout history, every significant technological advancement has sparked intense anxiety and resistance. Here are some of my favorite examples.

In the 16th century, Swiss scientist Conrad Gessner issued one of history’s first warnings about information overload, arguing that the printing press would overwhelm people with information and be “confusing and harmful” to the mind.

In 1858, when the transatlantic telegraph was introduced, The New York Times warned that it was “superficial, sudden, unsifted, too fast for the truth.” Does that sound familiar?

Even the humble bicycle wasn’t spared. In the 1890s, doctors coined the term “bicycle face” to describe the supposed permanent facial distortion caused by riding against the wind—a thinly veiled attempt to discourage women from the newfound freedom that bicycles offered.

Skipping forward to the early 1980s, “computerphobia“ became so widespread that IBM specifically designed software for “dedicated computerphobes.” People feared being replaced by machines, losing control, or simply looking stupid when confronted with the new technology. Magazines, newspapers, and even computer manuals devoted entire sections to combating this technological anxiety—a perfect mirror of today’s AI concerns in our industry.

New technologies are consistently feared for their potential to disrupt social norms, impact our physical and mental health, and undermine our moral foundations. Yet here’s what’s truly fascinating: When we examine these fears closely, they’re rarely about the technology itself. They’re about us—about what humans might do with that technology.

What We’re Really Afraid Of

When we ask, “Will AI replace editors?” we’re really asking if authors, managing editors, publishers, companies, and other decision-makers will prioritize cost-cutting over quality.

When we worry about AI “taking over creative work,” we’re actually expressing anxiety about an economic system that increasingly treats skilled professionals as replaceable components.

Science fiction author Ted Chiang puts it brilliantly: “Our fears about AI aren’t really about AI. They’re about capitalism.” The real question isn’t whether AI can do our work, but whether those who control the systems will value the deeply human elements that make our work matter.

This perspective shifts the conversation entirely. Instead of asking, “Can AI edit as well as humans?” we need to be asking, “Will people continue to value the uniquely human elements of editing that AI can’t replicate?”

The answer doesn’t hinge on how advanced AI gets—it depends on how boldly and clearly we step up and articulate our value.

Articulating the Value of Editing in the AI Era

The greatest threat to human editing isn’t AI—it’s our potential failure to articulate the true value of what we do. If we define editing primarily as catching errors or ensuring adherence to style guides, we position ourselves as easily replaceable. But if we can clearly communicate the depth and nuance of editorial work—the relationship-building, the cultural awareness, the emotional intelligence—we position ourselves as essential partners in the creative process.

It’s worth remembering that this is something we’ve always had to do. Throughout our profession’s history, we’ve constantly needed to explain and demonstrate our worth—whether to clients who wanted to skip professional editing altogether, to publishers looking to cut costs, or to authors who didn’t understand the difference between a spell-checker and a skilled human copyeditor.

The technology changes, but our core challenge remains the same: Communicating the unique value that only human editors can bring to the table.

The Soul of Editing: What Makes Human Editors Irreplaceable

At its core, editing is an act of deep empathy and connection. It’s about understanding not just what an author has written, but what they’re trying to say—and helping them bridge that gap. This requires a constellation of human capacities that AI simply doesn’t possess. Here is a shortlist:

Emotional Intelligence

Editing demands an intuitive understanding of how language affects readers emotionally. A skilled human editor knows when a winding, complex sentence perfectly captures the overwhelming nature of grief, or when a fragmented structure mirrors a character’s disjointed thoughts. We recognize when technical “mistakes” actually serve the deeper emotional truth of a narrative—distinctions that AI consistently fails to make.

Cultural Context and Lived Experience

Human editors bring their lived experience and cultural understanding to every manuscript. We recognize subtle nuances in how language reflects identity, power dynamics, and cultural context. We understand how words carry different weight in different communities and how language evolves over time. This cultural awareness isn’t just about avoiding offense—it’s about helping authors create work that resonates authentically with their intended audience. AI, trained on past usage, lacks this nuanced cultural understanding.

Relationship and Trust

Perhaps most fundamentally, editing is a relationship built on trust. When an author hands over their work—whether it’s a novel they’ve spent years crafting or a business document that could shape their career—they’re making themselves vulnerable. They’re inviting someone else into their creative process, their thinking, their voice. This trust enables the deep, honest conversations that lead to truly exceptional work. A skilled editor knows how to build this trust, how to deliver difficult feedback in a way that empowers rather than discourages, and how to champion an author’s vision even while helping refine it. This relationship can’t be replicated by an AI tool.

Judgment and Discernment

Editing requires constant judgment calls about when to intervene and when to step back, when to uphold rules and when to break them, when clarity should take precedence over style or vice versa. These decisions aren’t made in isolation but within the context of the work’s purpose, audience, and the author’s intentions. Human editors develop this judgment through years of experience—not just technical experience with language, but human experience with readers and writers. We understand that editing isn’t about applying rules mechanically but about making thoughtful choices that serve the work’s deeper purpose.

Looking Forward: The Future of Editing

Our profession will change, as it always has. Editors will need to show our value, as we always have. But the core of what we do—the deeply human work of helping authors express their unique vision with clarity, power, and authenticity—remains as vital as ever.

So, will AI replace editors? It depends. The clients and decision-makers who don’t value human editing will continue to devalue it—but honestly, these weren’t the clients you wanted anyway. They were the ones haggling over every penny, rushing your deadlines, and questioning your expertise long before AI entered the scene.

The clients worth having will continue to seek out skilled editors. They recognize that while AI may be able to help with mechanics, it can’t replicate the relationship, empathy, and judgment that make editing transformative rather than merely corrective.

I believe the future belongs to editors who can embrace technological change while holding firm to the human heart of our craft. Those who can articulate their value clearly, who understand both the capabilities and limitations of new tools, and who position themselves as guardians of authentic human expression will thrive in this new landscape.

Remember, my fellow word nerd, that this isn’t a new challenge. It’s simply the latest version of a conversation we’ve been having throughout our profession’s history. The technology changes, but our mission remains the same: Helping writers express themselves with clarity and authenticity.

In my next post, I’ll explore how to develop a thoughtful, ethical AI policy for your business, including communicating with clients about AI use and protecting their intellectual property.

Previous Posts in My "AI and Editors" Series

This post was published on March 19, 2025.

Are You Charging What You're Worth?

New to editorial freelancing and feeling like you need to learn all the things? Overwhelmed with projects but not making enough money? Forgoing breaks and vacation time to meet deadlines? My free, 9-lesson course gives you actionable ways to find your ideal freelance rates, say goodbye to the hustle, and build a profitable business that energizes you.